Rebekah Vardy ‘indicators for tell-all Wagatha Christie documentary to pay £1.5m authorized payments’

Rebekah Vardy has signed a deal to participate in tell-all documentary about her libel battle with Coleen Rooney to pay her authorized payments, it’s being reported.

The WAG – who’s married to Leicester Metropolis striker Jamie Vardy – is presently going through authorized payments working as much as £1.5million after shedding the Wagatha Christie courtroom case.

The 40-year-old has discovered her popularity in tatters after she was accused by Coleen of leaking ‘false tales’ to the media, with a decide ruling towards her within the Excessive Court docket.

Since then Coleen has signed a multimillion-pound cope with Disney+ for the possibility to element her model of occasions that led to one of many highest profile libel instances in British authorized historical past. 

Now Rebekah appears to have adopted swimsuit after signing a cope with Discovery+ for a documentary that will probably be launched within the coming months.

The Solar quotes a supply as saying: ‘Becky has been inundated with presents ever for the reason that trial ended.

‘She has made no secret she believes she has been exhausting executed by and is eager for her voice to be heard.

‘Proper now she is going through the prospect of a hefty authorized invoice and sees this documentary as a strategy to recoup a few of the prices.

‘Clearly her payment gained’t be something like the price of her attorneys however it should assist.’

It’s believed the WAG is going through authorized payments of as much as £1.5million, double the quantity initially estimated following the end result of the case.

Rebekah Vardy, pictured outside the High Court during the libel battle in May, has signed a documentary deal with Discovery+, it is being reported

Rebekah Vardy, pictured outdoors the Excessive Court docket through the libel battle in Could, has signed a documentary cope with Discovery+, it’s being reported

It comes after Coleen Rooney, pictured outside the High Court during the case in May, signed a documentary deal with Disney+

It comes after Coleen Rooney, pictured outdoors the Excessive Court docket through the case in Could, signed a documentary cope with Disney+

Rebekah Vardy will not appeal the High Court ruling which saw her lose the £3million Wagatha Christie libel battle against Coleen Rooney

Rebekah Vardy won’t enchantment the Excessive Court docket ruling which noticed her lose the £3million Wagatha Christie libel battle towards Coleen Rooney

The WAG - who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy , 35 - sued Coleen , 36, for libel after she accused Rebekah of leaking 'false stories' to the media, with a judge ruling against Rebekah at the High Court

The WAG – who’s married to Leicester Metropolis striker Jamie Vardy , 35 – sued Coleen , 36, for libel after she accused Rebekah of leaking ‘false tales’ to the media, with a decide ruling towards Rebekah on the Excessive Court docket

Mrs Vardy and her footballer husband have been left with a £3million legal bill after Mrs Justice Steyn ruled in favour of Mrs Rooney

The wife of the Leicester City striker relentlessly pursued the case against her Wag rival Coleen for nearly three years after being accused of leaking private stories about Coleen and her family to The Sun newspaper

Mrs Vardy and her footballer husband have been left with a £3million authorized invoice after Mrs Justice Steyn dominated in favour of Mrs Rooney

In a damning judgement Mrs Justice Steyn of the Excessive Court docket dominated that Rebekah and her agent Caroline Watt had leaked tales about Coleen.

Rebekah sued her former buddy for libel over a now-famous social media publish during which Coleen described organising a ‘sting operation’ by posting faux tales to chose followers on her non-public Instagram account to uncover who was leaking tales about her to The Solar.

The ‘huge reveal’ publish in October 2019 ended: ‘It is… Rebekah Vardy’s account.’

After Rebekah introduced authorized motion, Coleen provided her a ‘drop palms’ supply, which meant they’d each stroll away, paying their very own prices. She additionally steered they make a charity donation.

However Rebekah declined, resulting in a pricey Excessive Court docket trial. After her victory, Coleen desires her rival to pay up, with reviews estimating the ultimate quantity might be £3million.

There may be hypothesis that Rebekah and her husband, Leicester Metropolis striker Jamie, might need to promote their Portuguese villa to pay the authorized invoice, whereas the documentary deal might go some strategy to offsetting the quantity they owe. 

Final month it was reported that Rebekah had been weighing up presents as she set out plans to ‘doc the emotional turmoil’ she went via throughout authorized proceedings she instigated.

A supply advised the Mirror: ‘The present will doc her emotional turmoil each earlier than, throughout and after her courtroom case, which is ongoing to this present day.’

The insider confirmed that the documentary would not function any trial footage, including: ‘Becky at all times refused to permit cameras to comply with her through the libel case, in contrast to Coleen.’

Coleen, who’s the spouse of England’s all-time prime goalscorer Wayne Rooney, is ready to earn greater than her husband after securing a cope with Disney+ following a bidding warfare with different streaming giants.

Describing the undertaking they stated of their announcement: ‘The three-part collection will take viewers from the circumstances that led to her notorious Instagram publish that ‘broke the Web’ all the best way to Coleen being a profitable defendant in one of many UK’s highest-profile Excessive Court docket defamation instances introduced towards her by Rebekah Vardy.

‘In a narrative for our occasions, Wagatha Christie will reveal how fiercely decided and resilient Coleen needed to be so as to shield her household from the challenges offered by the standard and social media landscapes.’

The collection will take viewers again to the primary social media publish that initiated the story, during to the Excessive Court docket case, and can function interviews with household, buddies and key gamers concerned within the trial.

It should additionally have a look at how Coleen has been within the public highlight for twenty years, having begun courting footballer husband Wayne once they had been youngsters.

Sean Doyle, Disney+ director of unscripted content material, stated: ‘Properly what a narrative, first and and foremost. Every part we do must be a tremendous story that has wonderful twists and turns in it.

Rebekah Vardy's reputation lies in tatters after she sensationally lost the 'Wagatha Christie' libel case with Coleen Rooney

Rebekah Vardy's reputation lies in tatters after she sensationally lost the 'Wagatha Christie' libel case with Coleen Rooney

Rebekah Vardy’s popularity lies in tatters after she sensationally misplaced the ‘Wagatha Christie’ libel case with Coleen Rooney, who stated the case was a waste of cash and Vardy ought to by no means have taken it to courtroom

Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy together in 2016. The WAGs have ended up in court in the libel trial of the year and Mrs Vardy's reputation is in tatters after bringing the case and losing

Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy collectively in 2016. The WAGs have ended up in courtroom within the libel trial of the 12 months and Mrs Vardy’s popularity is in tatters after bringing the case and shedding

Wayne – who manages MLS staff DC United in Washington – earns a reported £800,000 a 12 months within the position. 

A supply advised The Solar: ‘It is a large deal for Coleen — in each sense. For the primary time in 20 years, she would be the major breadwinner.

‘She can be getting throughout her personal facet of the story when it comes to Wagatha Christie. Since her first damning social media publish outing Rebekah, she has remained steadfastly silent.

‘Now the general public will see first hand the toll this entire case took on her, and her household – and why she took the motion she took.’

Earlier this month it was revealed Rebekah will not enchantment Mrs Justice Steyn’s ruling, which stated swathes of her proof given underneath oath had been ‘manifestly inconsistent’, ‘not credible’ and wanted to be handled with ‘very appreciable warning’.

A supply advised The Solar: ‘It’s throughout and Becky desires to maneuver on. She is extraordinarily pissed off with attorneys and the authorized course of so hell would freeze over earlier than she wished to return into courtroom.

‘In the meanwhile she is having fun with being a mom, and a spouse. She was pregnant along with her youngest youngster when this entire factor blew up and he or she is 2 now.

‘So Becky is having fun with spending time along with her and her different kids — and doesn’t need one other authorized combat to get in the best way.’

 After the ruling Rebekah launched an announcement saying she was ‘extraordinarily unhappy and disenchanted’ on the decide’s choice.

She stated: ‘It isn’t the end result that I had anticipated, nor consider was simply. I introduced this motion to vindicate my popularity and am devastated by the decide’s discovering.

‘The decide accepted that publication of Coleen’s publish was not within the “public curiosity” and he or she additionally rejected her declare that I used to be the “Secret Wag”. However as for the remainder of her judgement, she acquired it unsuitable and that is one thing I can not settle for.’

She added: ‘The case is over. I need to thank everybody who has supported me.’

Coleen stated in an announcement that she was ‘happy’ the ruling went in her favour however that she ‘by no means believed’ the case ought to have gone to courtroom ‘at such expense in occasions of hardship for therefore many individuals when the cash might have been much better spent serving to others’.

Rebekah Vardy sketched in the High Court where she was accused of lying and giving 'implausible' evidence. She left court for an hour without explanation, returning with some Lucozade, her laptop and her lawyer

Rebekah Vardy sketched within the Excessive Court docket the place she was accused of mendacity and giving ‘implausible’ proof. She left courtroom for an hour with out rationalization, returning with some Lucozade, her laptop computer and her lawyer

Rebekah Vardy has said she was wrong to trust her friend and agent Caroline Watt (left), who has been too ill to attend the trial, accusing her of leaking stories about Coleen. The judgment has said they were both involved

Rebekah Vardy has stated she was unsuitable to belief her buddy and agent Caroline Watt (left), who has been too ailing to attend the trial, accusing her of leaking tales about Coleen. The judgment has stated they had been each concerned

She stated: ‘It was not a case I ever sought or wished. I by no means believed it ought to have gone to courtroom at such expense in occasions of hardship for therefore many individuals when the cash might have been much better spent serving to others.

‘Each earlier than and after my social media posts in October 2019, I made each effort to keep away from the necessity for such a drawn out and public courtroom case. All my makes an attempt to take action had been knocked again by Mrs (Rebekah) Vardy.

‘This left me with no different however to undergo with the case to defend myself and to finish the repeated leaking of my non-public data to The Solar.

‘These leaks from my non-public Instagram account started in 2017. They continued for nearly two years, intruding on my privateness and that of my household. Though I bear Mrs Vardy no ill-will, in the present day’s judgment makes clear that I used to be proper in what I stated in my posts of October 2019.

‘Lastly, I wish to thank all of my authorized staff, my household, buddies and everybody who supported me, together with the general public, via this tough and demanding time.’

The spouse of the Leicester Metropolis striker relentlessly pursued the case towards her Wag rival Coleen for practically three years after being accused of leaking non-public tales about Coleen and her household to The Solar newspaper.

The bombshell verdict from Court docket 13 of the Excessive Court docket was handed down remotely on-line by Mrs Justice Steyn simply over two months after the listening to in Could. Vardy’s failed libel swimsuit has been branded probably the most ill-advised in historical past.

Mrs Vardy had insisted on a full trial within the glare of the worldwide media – and misplaced.

The Excessive Court docket discovered that Mrs Rooney’s social media publish accusing her rival was ‘considerably true’ and that Mrs Vardy ‘knew of, condoned and was actively engaged’ in leaks to the media by her ex-agent Caroline Watt.

The post that accused Rebekah Vardy's social media account of leaking stories. It sparked a £3million legal battle that Mrs Rooney won after the judge agreed it was 'substantially true' and therefore not libellous

The publish that accused Rebekah Vardy’s social media account of leaking tales. It sparked a £3million authorized battle that Mrs Rooney gained after the decide agreed it was ‘considerably true’ and subsequently not libellous

And in a damning evaluation of Mrs Vardy’s proof, the decide stated ‘important components weren’t credible’ and at occasions her ‘proof was manifestly inconsistent with the contemporaneous documentary proof, evasive or implausible’. 

Against this, the decide discovered that Coleen and her witnesses, together with husband Wayne, ‘gave trustworthy, dependable proof.’

Mrs Justice Steyn additionally dominated that lack of WhatsApp messages between Mrs Vardy and Ms Watt was ‘deliberate somewhat than unintended’ – dismissing her agent’s declare {that a} cellphone fell into the North Sea when a ship hit an enormous wave.

In her ruling, the decide stated it was ‘probably’ that Mrs Vardy’s agent on the time, Caroline Watt, ‘undertook the direct act’ of passing the knowledge to The Solar.

However she added: ‘Nonetheless, the proof… clearly exhibits, in my opinion, that Mrs Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively participating in it by directing Ms Watt to the non-public Instagram account, sending her screenshots of Mrs Rooney’s posts, drawing consideration to gadgets of potential curiosity to the press, and answering further queries raised by the press through Ms Watt.

The decide added: ‘In my judgment, the conclusions that I’ve reached as to the extent to which the claimant engaged in disclosing to The Solar data to which she solely had entry as a permitted follower of an Instagram account which she knew, and Mrs Rooney repeatedly asserted, was non-public, suffice to indicate the only that means is considerably true.’

For per week in Could, the case captivated hundreds of thousands who had been left open-mouthed by the proof together with explosive and expletive-filled Whatsapp messages despatched by Ms Vardy in addition to Coleen’s proof about leaking false tales about her non-public life to seek out who was giving them to the tabloids and the way her marriage nearly fell aside after her husband Wayne was caught drink-driving with a celebration woman.

Leave a Comment